When should I use an EOR instead of contract staffing?

Use an EOR when you already identified the person and only need compliant employment, payroll and benefits in a country where you have no entity. Use contract staffing when you also need the worker found, and want one blended rate covering sourcing, employment and statutory burden.

When does our own entity beat EOR?

Typically above roughly 12 to 20 employees in a single country held for 24 months or more, because per-employee fees compound while entity costs are largely fixed. The crossover moves with salary levels and statutory burden, so it should be modeled on your actual roles rather than assumed.

What if the tool recommends AOR but our role is full time?

Then the role is employment, not contracting, and we will say so. A full-time, supervised role performed exclusively for one client is an employment relationship in every major LATAM jurisdiction regardless of contract wording, and the correct model is EOR or contract staffing.

Owned entities and governed partners across all of Latin America, compliance, consultancy and implementation under one contract, SILA, a Gracemark company

SILAStaffing in Latin America

Build my plan free Talk to a specialist

Free tool, no email required

Engagement Model Finder: AOR, EOR, staffing, SOW or BOTT

Five questions, one recommendation, and the compliance risk we would flag before you sign anything.

Free tool

Engagement Model Finder

Five questions. No email. You get the model, the alternative, the cost shape and the risk we would flag.

01Who finds the worker?

02Employee or independent contractor?

03Are you buying capacity or an outcome?

04How long is the engagement?

05Do you have a local entity in the country?

Your recommended model appears here

Answer all five questions to see the engagement model, who legally employs the worker, the cost shape, realistic speed and the compliance risk we would flag.

How is the right engagement model chosen?

The right engagement model depends on five facts: who found the worker, whether they are an employee or a genuine independent contractor, whether you are buying capacity or an outcome, how long the engagement lasts, and whether you hold a local entity. Those five answers narrow eight models, AOR, contract staffing, EOR, staff augmentation, direct hire, RPO, SOW and build-operate-transfer, to one, with an alternative worth pricing.

The eight models, side by side

Model	Who employs	Cost shape	Time to live	Risk to watch
AOR, agent of record	Nobody, the worker stays an independent contractor, screened for misclassification risk	Flat monthly fee per contractor plus FX and payment costs	2–5 business days once documents are collected	Full-time, supervised, exclusive work is employment in every major LATAM jurisdiction. If the classification test fails we convert the worker to EOR rather than paper over the risk.
Contract staffing	Gracemark entity or a governed in-country partner	One blended hourly or monthly rate covering salary, statutory burden and fee	2–5 weeks from intake to first day	In Mexico, supplying personnel requires REPSE registration and a specialized-services scope. Ask any provider to show theirs.
EOR, employer of record	Gracemark entity as the legal employer; you direct the work day to day	Salary + statutory employer burden + per-employee monthly fee	5–15 business days for an identified candidate	When headcount and tenure in one country make your own entity cheaper than EOR, we run that math with you and offer to build and operate the entity. No forced exit, no forced stay.
Staff augmentation	Gracemark entity or governed partner	Per-seat monthly rate, no severance exposure on your books	2–5 weeks per seat, faster for repeat profiles	You are buying capacity, not an outcome. If you want a deliverable with a price and a date, use SOW instead.
Direct hire	You, through your local entity	One-time placement fee, then salary and statutory burden on your payroll	3–6 weeks to signed offer for professional roles	Requires an existing entity or an EOR bridge until yours is registered.
RPO, recruitment process outsourcing	You (or an EOR of your choice), we run the funnel, not the employment	Monthly recruiter capacity fee, far below per-hire agency fees at volume	Sourcing live in 2–3 weeks	Only makes economic sense above roughly 8–10 hires per year in the region.
SOW / managed outcome	Gracemark, including supervision, tooling and management layer	Fixed-scope milestone price or monthly managed-pod fee	3–6 weeks to first delivery	Genuine SOW requires real acceptance criteria. Hourly staffing dressed as SOW is a co-employment and procurement problem, not a saving.
BOTT, build, operate, transfer	Gracemark first, you after transfer	Operating fee during build, defined transfer fee at handover	Operating in weeks; entity and transfer typically 8–20 weeks in parallel	Insist the transfer price and trigger are in the original contract. Vendors that leave it open re-price at your point of maximum dependence.

Get this costed for my roles Ask the AI architect instead